The Lemkos are one of the Carpathian Rusyn groups – an East Slavic people historically inhabiting the Beskid Niski and Sądecki ranges, today divided between Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine, as well as a widespread diaspora. Their culture developed at the intersection of Byzantine Christianity, vernacular traditions and the shifting borders of Central and Eastern Europe, producing a distinct language, religious practice and visual heritage, particularly in icon painting and architecture.
The 20th century brought profound disruption: wartime violence, forced displacements and the 1947 Operation Vistula campaign scattered Lemko communities across Poland, fracturing the continuity of cultural transmission. Contemporary Lemko identity therefore unfolds between memory and reinvention, shaped as much by absence, migration and multilingualism as by rooted, place-based traditions.
Anastazja Kanarska: The exhibition ‘Forms of Presence: The Art of Lemkos/Carpatho-Rusyns’ addresses a minority culture, yet it contains neither nostalgia nor the hush of a museum. Which mattered more to you: memory or the present?
Michał Szymko: This exhibition matters to me precisely because it addresses a minority culture while refusing to stay at the level of memory or nostalgia. It speaks just as powerfully about modernity and endurance. It shows that despite an extraordinarily dramatic 20th century – after Thalerhof [an internment camp for Rusyns from Galicia and Bukovina, operating between 1914 and 1917 – ed.], after World War II, after Operation Vistula, after the experience of communism that systematically sought to destroy our culture, after protracted processes of assimilation – the culture of the Carpathian Rusyns has not disappeared.
AK: It still exists, albeit in an altered form.
MS: Today, the young generation of Lemkos operates across several languages. Some use Lemko, some Polish. I myself am an example of this – my first language is Polish. This interrupted, disrupted transmission of identity remains one of the most significant post-war experiences and continues to resonate strongly in artistic practice.
At the same time, it was essential to me that the exhibition brought together artists from different diasporas. Darjan Hardi from Serbia is present, as are Adalbert Erdélyi and Józef Bokšay, founders of the Transcarpathian school of painting – artists closely associated with Uzhhorod and Budapest. This demonstrates that we’re not dealing with a single local narrative but with a network of experiences stretched across borders.
A particularly significant presence in the exhibition is Paraska Plytka-Horytsvit – a Hutsul woman from the Ukrainian Carpathians. Her work, read today from a contemporary perspective, remains strikingly relevant. Though she’s sometimes described as a folk artist or writer, her voice reaches far beyond folkloric categories and continues to move audiences with its intensity. During one of the guided tours, someone asked why we hadn’t included her paintings. I explained that we very much wanted to, but that she clearly stated in her will that her works must never leave Ukraine. That was her unambiguous wish, and as a curator I feel bound to honour it fully. That’s why the exhibition only features her photographs. The cycle opens and closes with the figure of Paraska – in the final photograph, she gazes into the Carpathians, into the distance, ahead of her.
Her presence moves me deeply. I hope that those who weren’t previously familiar with her work will pause at these photographs. They carry enormous documentary value, but also an existential one: they allow us today to reconstruct what life was like in a Hutsul village, while simultaneously prompting questions about the meaning of memory, presence and cultural continuity.