When we talk about Ukraine, it’s impossible to ignore the topic of war. Besides, security is the main theme of the Polish presidency. Will we find any echoes of war in ‘Unity’?
I can’t rule out that the war abroad doesn’t subconsciously influence the music I create. I don’t work in a vacuum, I watch the news. In one part of the piece, I want to show that problems can be overcome if we tackle them together. However, I’ve always avoided simple, unambiguous statements – I believe that music and art aren’t meant to impose ready-made answers. We need metaphors and spaces that allow for individual interpretation.
What is European culture to you?
The diversity of cultures that create it, but above all the richness of classical culture and aesthetics, which are immortal. Look at contemporary narrative arts – film, literature or theatre. In essence, everything has already been said by Shakespeare, only the decorations change. It’s similar in music – we all refer to the past and that’s beautiful. Some say that everything has already been said, but such thinking’s completely alien to me. I know I’m commenting on and continuing the past, but it doesn’t block me at all.
To me, European culture is the most interesting and has the most to offer – I think that can be stated objectively. And I’m saying this with full admiration and respect for other cultures that have their own colour and value. Incidentally, they very often reach for patterns developed in Europe.
When talking about the idea for your piece, you mentioned the unity that characterises Americans.
I feel very good in the States, I like their openness. Of course, I can only talk about the circles I move in – maybe if I went south and sat down with people who don’t mix with others much, it wouldn’t be as nice. But I do think Europe needs some American traits.
Americans are aware that their history is very short. When they hear a piece from the Baroque period, it’s a big wow for them – you can feel it.
They also have a huge enthusiasm for working together, which I miss in our thinking. In fact, the most important thing in creation is enthusiasm! There are many stories about the creation of American films that were struggled to be made, with penny budgets and a tiny crew, but with great determination. Some of the most interesting works from American cinema were created thanks to clever hustling, networking and meeting people in natural situations.
You said you avoid simple declarations, but the title ‘Unity’ itself is a declaration, not to mention the subtitles of the subsequent parts. What social and political value does music have for you?
I certainly have no illusions about music being able to change the course of history or politics. But it can influence emotions – and emotions are key in politics today. Election results often depend not on substantive arguments, but on skilful control of social moods. And that is exactly what political players do. If my music can inspire someone to do something good, then I am very happy. Quite simply. An artist is there to move – to provide emotions and encourage reflection.
Making music together is a value.
There’s nothing more beautiful than creating music together!
It reminds me of initiatives such as El Sistema – a programme initiated in 1975 by José Antonio Abreu in Venezuela, which engaged young people from ‘difficult neighbourhoods’ in creating an orchestra together. Over time, similar projects began to be created all over the world. Do you ever get involved in teaching?
I do sometimes run workshops for pianists, although I haven’t yet participated in projects of that nature. But I do believe they’re extremely important and have great potential. If such an offer came up, I’d certainly be very open to it. When it comes to the Venezuelan orchestra El Sistema, its effects were truly phenomenal. Thanks to music, it was possible to pull children away from poverty and crime. The emotion that sound brings is often a salvation. Such activities are also of great importance in hospitals and prisons. Music has great power, and people are naturally sensitive – you just have to awaken that sensitivity in them. All of us knows someone who normally seems thick-skinned and devoid of emotion, but in contact with the beauty of sound, they suddenly open up and soften.
Returning to musical topics... Do you compose on a computer?
I literally finished my new album yesterday. This time I wrote everything down by hand, but that’s an exception. I write my first sketches of ideas with a pen in a special notebook. Later, I work on a computer because it’s more convenient and legible. Recently I watched an interview with Quentin Tarantino, in which he said that he writes exclusively by hand, because according to him, poetry can’t be created on a computer. I don’t have that extreme an approach, but this analogue vibe does really inspire me. I look for ideas at the piano with a pen in my hand. After that my workflow becomes quite modern.
I’m reminded of a scene from the documentary ‘Music by John Williams’ in which the composer shows how he writes everything by hand and jokes that his younger colleagues do it much faster because they work on computers. It’s hard to imagine him creating more, he is quite a prolific artist...
There’s an opinion that when you write by hand, you devote more attention to each note – there’s no ‘copy/paste’ option then. There is something to that. I like combining the classical and modern approaches myself. I have that in many areas – I love modern technology, but I approach vintage things with equal sentiment. I listen to music via streaming, but I also love vinyl. This even applies to cars – I appreciate modern solutions, but old models have a unique charm for me.
To close our conversation, I’d like to ask a question that I ask every composer. What does it mean to be a composer?
You know, a composer, like any artist, simply has a need to create something and share their music – and they do. Does it have a special social function? I don't think so. That is to say: every profession has a social role. A composer couldn’t create freely if they didn’t have access to food – and they have this access thanks to suppliers, shops, trade and so on. There are many examples of that. That’s why I don’t see the profession of composer as having any special social mission. Although for me, creating music is something special – that’s for sure. But it’s rather the personal emotion that’s associated with it. And I don’t expect others to look at composers in the same way.
So composing is emotions.
Definitely yes. I have to say that I’m also excited about the craft itself. I don’t like it when it’s underestimated – especially in art. It’s the craft that allows emotions to fully blossom. Without it, everything just blurs somewhere.
Do you feel threatened by artificial intelligence?
For now – no. I use chatbots very regularly, but not for composing. Although I have to admit that I did have one interesting experience: I threw an arrangement I’d made into the chat – it wasn’t a composition – and jokingly asked if it could assess the level of my orchestration. I thought it’d be impossible, but the AI generated a really extensive analysis for me. The kind I’d expect from a composer who had carefully studied the score. The AI did make a few mistakes – for example, the bar numbers didn’t match. But I was amazed at how it formulated its comments. For example: ‘If this procedure was a conscious sonoristic intention – fine. But if not, it’s worth writing it differently.’ The very fact that the algorithm was able to put it this way made a big impression on me. In many places, it was indeed my intention, but, when it came to one suggestion, I did actually change something. I believe that sooner or later AI will find employment in composition – it’ll speed up the process, just like music notation programs used to do. It’ll definitely be used for music in commercials – maybe with the exception of campaigns for luxury brands, which will want to have an artist’s signature and even brag about it.
However, I still think AI only synthesises what already exists. It doesn’t invent anything new. Humans, with their unpredictability and madness, can create something truly surprising. That’s why I treat AI as a tool. And I believe that those who learn to use it will win – because they’ll work faster and become more attractive on the market.
Interview originally conducted in Polish, May 2025, translated into English by Michał Pelczar, May 2025.