'One of Us': Conrad and English Politics and Culture
Allan H. Simmons, St Mary's College, Strawberry Hill

Joseph Conrad, photo: Wikipedia
My subject is Joseph Conrad's early engagement, both as citizen and as writer, with England and Englishness. Taking as my starting-point Terry Eagleton's claim that 'There are of course vital historical affinities at work in any culture, which the postmodern cult of the discontinuous damagingly ignores' (3). I shall consider the political and cultural 'affinities' that confront Conrad as he negotiates his path from British mariner to English writer and then use these to frame my discussion of his early career as an author. In the process I hope to show that the contemporary debate surrounding Englishness is itself composed of the 'irreconcilable antagonisms' to which Conrad referred in his letter to the New York Times 'Saturday Review' of 2 August 1901 (CL2 348).
One obvious consequence of this concerns the charge of racism levelled at 'Heart of Darkness'. To reflect an inclusive English perspective, Marlow must necessarily represent both pro- and anti-imperial views. The Manichaean criticism that lines up behind either Achebe or his opponents serves ideological allegiances but it is not comprehensive.
Conrad the sailor
On 19 August 1886, in London between overseas duty in the Tilkhurst and Highland Forest,1 Conrad officially became a naturalised citizen of Great Britain, a subject of Queen Victoria.2 Biographically the timing is felicitous: his naturalisation was granted between Conrad's failing and passing his master's certificate (in July and November of the same year). The Tilkhurst voyage itself separates his first-mate and captain's examinations. A Polish nobleman now cased in a distinctly better quality of British tar, Conrad's first known letters in English date from this time. Written to Spiridion Kliszczewski from Singapore, where the Tilkhurst offloaded coal, and Calcutta, where she loaded jute, they offer his first thoughts about the politics of his soon-to-be adopted country.
Achieving his captain's certificate Conrad had succeeded against the understandable early resistance of his uncle, Tadeusz Bobrowski. Conrad recalls his response to passing his examination thus: 'It was an answer to certain outspoken scepticism, and even to some not very kind aspersions. I had vindicated myself from what had been cried upon as a stupid obstinacy or a fantastic caprice' (PR 120). His sense of becoming his own man, of identity, is inescapably linked to British seamanship, as his writing would later identify him with the great tradition of English letters.3
The essays and occasional pieces that spanned his writing career show that Conrad had an active not simply a legal bond with the public life of Britain. He was a professional twice over, a professional seaman and a professional writer, and professionalism, by definition, is exclusive. citizenship, by contrast, is inclusive.
Despite such off-hand comments as 'I never look at the papers, so I know nothing of politics and literature (CL2 138), the subject matter of Conrad's essays suggests that they emerge from his reflections on the pages of the daily press – now responding to the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-5; now attacking theatrical censorship; now bringing his maritime expertise to bear on the Titanic disaster, and charging the Board of Trade and the press with irresponsibility; now discussing Poland's re-emergence as a nation state after the First World War.
On the other side of this coin is Conrad's scepticism voiced, for instance, in his 1904 essay on Anatole France, whom he describes as 'a good republican': 'political institutions, whether contrived by the wisdom of the few or the ignorance of the many, are incapable of securing the happiness of mankind' (NLL 30). As John Stape argues, Conrad's political writings 'transcend their specific circumstances to become larger statements about the nature of the state and the individual's relationship to it, concerns rooted in his family's experience as well as those of the average civilised individual' (NLL xlvii).
Conrad reveals his early political allegiances as Conservative in the letters to Kliszczewski of October and December 1885.4 They record that he read the (Conservative) Daily Telegraph sent to him by Kliszczewski 'expecting great things' (CL1 12) in the wake of the Liberal government's defeat by a Conservative budget-amendment in June 1885, and on the general election in November that year: 'I and the rest of the 'right thinking' have been grievously disappointed by the result of the General Election' (CL1 15-16). The elections yielded a Conservative victory, but with a minority government. (Importantly, they ushered in 20 years of near-unbroken Conservative rule.) Conrad's family history complicates his political allegiance to an Empire composed of territories whose boundaries took no account of tribal origins.
Whether Conrad realised it or not when he famously declared to another refugee from Poland, 'When speaking, writing or thinking in English the word Home always means for me the hospitable shores of Great Britain' (CL1 12), there was already a public clamour to restrict immigration into Britain. In a letter to The Times of 31 May 1904, the young Liberal, Winston Churchill, defended 'the old tolerant and generous practice of free entry and asylum to which the country has so long adhered and from which it has so often greatly gained' (10), but the Conservative government's 'Aliens Act' of 1905 restricted immigration into Britain for the first time.
Politically, Conrad's sentiments formulate a sense of his Polish history. Having pinned his hopes on the Conservatives to form an anti-Russian alliance with Germany, his despondence about Britain's limited influence on Continental affairs is evident. Following the election and the constitution of a minority Conservative government he proclaims: 'Joy reigns in St. Petersburg, no doubt, and profound disgust in Berlin' (CL1 16).
In time Conrad would come to warn that German expansionism could lead to a divided Europe (in 'Autocracy and War') – and, of course, by which time German imperialism had already declared its hand, not least in Kaiser Wilhelm's telegram of 3 January 1896 sent to congratulate President Kruger on successfully repulsing Jameson's invasion of the Transvaal. Kipling remembered the Jameson Raid as 'the first battle in the war of 14-18 – a little before its time but necessary to clear the ground' (letter to Herbert Baker, 13 January 1934; in Lycett 296-97).
Conrad's political sentiments are shaped by his reaction to what he perceives as a dead Poland. British politics evoke only 'a state of despairing indifference; for, whatever may be the changes in the fortunes of living nations, for the dead there is no hope and no salvation! … nothing remains for us but the darkness of oblivion' (CL1 12). The morbid patriotic sentiments directly echo those of the poem written by his father to commemorate Conrad's birth, with its lines: 'Poland your Mother is in her grave' and 'no salvation without Her!' (in CUFE 33). It was in this letter, too, that Conrad foresaw 'the lurid light of battlefields somewhere in the near future' (CL1 12).
Conrad was British, as he assured David Bone, 'by choice': 'I am more British than you are. You are only British because you could not help it' (Bone 160). And the Britain of Conrad's choice was imperial. The great fact of British life, the empire, provided Conrad with a living, with security, and with a sense of communal recognition and belonging. As a member of the British Merchant Service, engaged in the practical reality of empire, Conrad was part of the great web of communication that assimilated remote areas of the world into the British economy. It would be surprising if his political allegiances were not Conservative. His response to British politics, as his letters to Kliszczewski show, is fashioned by a combination of immigrant complex and self-preservation.5
But while Conservative imperialism dominates British politics at this period, the age is equally characterised by portents of imperial disintegration, and, related to this, strains between old hierarchies of authority and power and an incipient democracy. Conrad's political anxieties extend to the rising tide of Continental socialism and the ineffectuality of Empire to counteract this: 'The great British Empire went over the edge ... Where's the man to stop the crashing avalanche? | Where's the man to stop the rush of social-democratic ideas? ... the sun is set and the last barrier removed. England was the only barrier to the pressure of infernal doctrines born in Continental back-slums' (CL1 16).
Whether 'born in Continental back-slums' or not, the 'rush of social-democratic ideas' that Conrad dreaded was certainly gaining purchase. Gladstone's Reform Bills in 1884 and 1885 extended the vote and, in effect, prepared the way for the extended franchise guaranteed by the Act of 1918 – up to which point only about 60% of adult males had the parliamentary vote. British political life mirrored the changing configurations and realignments of national identity. Its leanings towards socialism were evident in the founding of the Fabian Society in 1884, whose members included Sidney and Beatrice Webb, George Bernard Shaw, and H.G. Wells.
In 1886 unemployed East Enders rioted in Trafalgar Square and looted shops in Oxford Street; in the two years that followed strikes by East End match-girls and dockworkers launched the new and powerful unionism. The need for an increasingly unionised working class to be represented in the House of Commons led to the formation of the Independent Labour Party in 1893.
Conrad's response to contemporary public events is surprisingly muted at times. The deaths of Queen Victoria (1901), Gladstone (1898), and Salisbury (1903), for instance, go unmentioned in his surviving letters, while Edward VII's coronation is barely noticed. But if this reticence is itself his comment upon national politics, he is exercised by international events, such as the Boer War, 'the Krüger-Chamberlain combination' as he calls it (CL2 302).6
While one may put some of this interest down to the fact of his friend, Ted Sanderson's involvement, his comments about the respective merits of British generals suggests a deeper fascination. It is the internationalist Conrad who argues to Zagórska in December 1899 that: 'This war is not so much a war against the Transvaal as a struggle against the doings of German influence. It is the Germans who have forced the issue. There can be no doubt about it' (CL2 229).
A contemporary cartoon that appeared during the Boer War depicts Kitchener and Kipling as toy figures, representing respectively the sword and the pen, with the accompanying doggerel: 'When the Empire wants a stitch in her | Send for Kipling and for Kitchener' (see Buitenhuis 7). And if Kipling, who Rider Haggard described as a true 'watchman of our Empire' (in Lycett 306), was the poet of the right, the left too had its cultural voices, in writers such as George Bernard Shaw, who observes in Misalliance (1909): 'Rome fell; Carthage fell; Hindhead's turn will come'.
Conrad's early anxieties about private and professional acceptance are acutely registered in his letters. On the one hand, a letter from Helen Watson, Ted Sanderson's wife-to-be, is 'like a high assurance of being accepted, admitted within, the people and land of my choice' (CL1 347), and, on the other, criticism of The Secret Agent leads to the outburst: 'Ive been so cried up of late as a sort of freak, an amazing bloody foreigner writing in English' (CL3 488).
Looking back on his life as an immigrant, Conrad would write: 'I went out into the world before I was seventeen, to France and England, and in neither country did I feel myself a stranger for a moment: neither as regards ideas, sentiments, or institutions' (to George T. Keating, 14 December 1922; CL7 forthcoming). Yet, the professional detachment of the writer corresponds to a mirroring perception of him as 'an alien of genius' (in Sherry, ed. 185), and he remains on his death, to Virginia Woolf at least, 'our guest' despite having spent the greater part of his life living on English soil.
Conrad's early novels, to which I shall now turn, suggest the pattern of his engagement with prevailing public themes: imperialism in Almayer's Folly and An Outcast of the Islands; maritime history in The Nigger of the 'Narcissus' and Typhoon; and, 'framed' by this 'sea stuff', the 'hidden' rules of social inclusion that define the gentleman, in Lord Jim. I am aware that my brush strokes are broad here, since all three concerns, the Empire, the Sea, and Inclusiveness are interrelated and mutually defining.
But this is part of my point: when Conrad settled in England to write, he was well equipped to train an ethnologist's eye on the natives at a moment when what it meant to be English was being contested. He brought to bear an immigrant's perspective, uniquely coloured by his Polish experience and French and British Merchant Marine histories, on the ambiguities and paradoxes in English life. As Marlow says: 'the onlookers see most of the game' (LJ 224).