FL: Precisely, let’s get back to the band. Other than turning into a trio, you’ve also changed your producer.
GK: Nick Launay has entered the picture during our new trio-life, the man responsible for the sound of most of Nick Cave’s albums. He’s also worked with Gang of Four and many other brilliant artists. Launay is a genius and a living legend, but most importantly, he turned out to be a wonderful, kind, warm and good person. He came from the Hollywood Hills to our studio in Wrzeszcz, and later to the one in Osowa [both districts of Gdańsk – ed.]. It was extremely hard work from morning to night, but deeply satisfying.
At first, we were needlessly paranoid and afraid that Nick would want to overhaul everything. But the changes he proposed turned out to be minor yet absolutely crucial, transforming the compositions in terms of dynamics and impact.
The first interview you did with me had the English title ‘A Glitch in the System’. I think your intuition was spot on. The things Trupa Trupa has done, as well as my poetry and academic projects, are ‘glitches’. They simply run counter to the way rock bands, literary careers and academic paths normally work. Nothing quite adds up here – and in my opinion, that’s a big advantage. I’m not saying it’s better, or that anything else is worse. But it’s autonomous. And different in its openness to mistakes and errors, through its inconsistent personal and thematic makeup.
FL: You often bring up topics about your identity, including problems accepting it.
GK: It’s only recently that I realised that, for most of my life, I wasn’t really accepted for who I was. Looking back, I kept trying to adapt, unsuccessfully, and trying on different masks, also unsuccessfully.
It’s only now that I’m in my 40s that I feel like the jigsaw pieces have come together in a fully positive way. Earlier, even though I wasn’t afraid, I often wondered if maybe it was my fault, that maybe I was the troublemaker. After all, other people don’t seem to break down as much, so maybe it’s not worth protesting. Maybe you’re just supposed to stay in your lane in this post-Soviet reality?
It’s only now that I feel a sense of liberation. It might not be euphoric, but I feel extraordinarily satisfied that I’ve managed to recover my childhood self. That is, the psychological state where you’re six years old and you see the evil in yourself and others, and it saddens you, but at the same time you have a lot of optimism and joy, and the naivety to try and change it. You accept who you are.
FL: When working in the West, do you feel more accepted?
GK: I think the process of being accepted in the West was just as important for me as the influence of my family. Around 95% of the projects I work on take place either at Oxford or at Yale – very much outside of Poland. I’ve no resentment about that, it’s just how things have turned out. In my opinion, part of the reason is that there’s still this prevailing post-Soviet mentality in many places in Poland – one in which everyone’s expected to know their place in the hierarchy.
It’s also connected to the fact that if what you’re proposing isn’t a copy of a Western trend or movement, or isn’t firmly rooted in the Polish here-and-now, people don’t know what to make of it or how to consume it. And with us, things have always been crooked and different. I’ve never wanted to reformat myself or my art according to the post-Soviet demands of fear and fashion.
That’s not to say that everything in Poland works that way – I’m just speaking from my own experience. And I want to emphasise that I know plenty of excellent Polish artists and great Polish art. I’m aware that by criticising Poland, I’m being a stereotypical Pole – and, with age, that Polish trait does seem to be getting stronger.