Here are people, who’s birth marked the beginning of the world, who were raised with no past, ancestors or family memories. Who – as one of our main characters – had long lived with the conviction, that being a grandfather was a public function, because in her neighbourhood in Israel, there was only one and he was ‘shared’. They are people, who may have heard the following at the dinner table: ‘Eat it and be grateful you’re not in Auschwitz. You would appreciate what food means if you were there.' Raised by ‘odd’ parents – such as Gitli’s father, who was silent and only ‘read, wrote and smoked cigarettes’. Who were convinced, that you’re not allowed to be sick, because otherwise you won’t pass the selection process. Almost without exception, obsessively devoted to their parents, very protective, brave and deeply lonely. Often living a double life, invisible in some way – like Towa, a seemingly joyful, ‘energetic woman’, who was in fact distrustful even toward her own husband. ‘My mathematics teacher says: who believes in my happiness, will not see my pain’. Caught in the trap of ‘bravery’. 'Tell your parents, that your sex life is unfulfilling and that’s why you’re depressed. Tell your parents, that your children are naughty and those are your problems.’ When in fact – like Jossi, who wonders what things one should take for their child in Treblinka, when he packs his family for vacation – they are slacklining over an abyss.
I blame Auschwitz is a sort of collective portrait, in which similar concepts crop up. One of them is certainly a distrust towards psychologists, therapists and loneliness in the face of ‘post-suffering’. Often so, it seems as if the interviews conducted by Grynberg are a form of therapy itself (not always though, other times they are more like a door slam). The book is not a record of Grynberg’s ‘questioning’. The uniqueness of Grynberg’s book is the fact that it rather resembles a search for kindred spirits, a ritual, in which one of the main characters is also the author, searching for something much greater than just another story. ‘Why are you sitting here with me for so long and listening to what I am saying?’ – Daniel from Downtown Manhattan asks him. ‘I just gained a new brother and that’s something, isn’t it?’ – asks Grynberg. ‘I feel a need to listen to these stories’ – he says in another place. ‘You’re addicted to them’ – says the interviewer.
At times, reading these conversations feels like eavesdropping a meeting, between two people, between whom something very important is happening. Grynberg – emotional, viewing the main characters, as his fellow brothers and sisters, speaking from the depth of his own experience, balancing between the role of the author and one of the characters - is probably the only one, who could have succeeded at this endeavour. That is writing a book, that is equally gloomy, as it is whimsical, provocative, moving, revealing deep wounds, but also love.
In I blame Auschwitz’s prologue he writes, that he would once like to hear that the stories that are told in it, are our – meaning all people’s – heritage. The book also entails another, often repeated suggestion: that only ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’ can truly understand each other. Grynberg’s book – as any, that manages to reach the truth about people – sheds some light on other contexts, experiences and areas of reality as well. He not only found a way to ‘write about what is going on in our heads for others to see’ but also created a universal story about children and their parents, about a cross-generational transmission of suffering, about facing loss and endless desolation.