Proto-expressionism
Stanisław Przybyszewski became the main animator of expressionist tendencies. He came to Kraków from Berlin in the autumn of 1898 and was famously known as the 'brilliant Pole', a friend of Munch and Strindberg, a member of Berlin’s artistic and intellectual bohemia, a satanist and occultist. The philosophical and literary treatises Chopin und Nietzsche, Ola Hansson, Totenmesse, Psychischer Naturalismus, Auf den Wegen der Seele, and his monograph Das Werk des Edvard Munch published together with Franz Servaes, Willy Pastor, and Julius Meier-Graef, paved Przybyszewski’s way to fame. He sparked moral unrest in Kraków, demolished the existing hierarchy of values, surrounded himself with an aura of scandal and a circle of followers mocking the mentality of ‘philistines’. At the beginning of 1899, he published a manifesto of new aesthetics in Życie – Confiteor. It identified art with religion and proclaimed the apotheosis of a priest-artist who was a 'cosmic, metaphysical force through which the absolute and eternity manifest'. By rejecting the patriotic, ethical and social functions of art, Przybyszewski claimed that true art had no 'purpose, it is an end in itself, it is an absolute, because it is a reflection of the absolute of the soul'.
Penetrating into the subconscious, the writer created the theory of the 'naked soul'. As an ardent follower of Schopenhauer’s views, he saw the driving force behind human existence in the sexual instinct that inevitably leads to destruction. Based on the fatalistic theory, Geschlechtstrieb formulated the 'metaphysics of the sexes', the philosophy of the eternal struggle between woman and man from which woman emerges victoriously as the figure of an 'apocalyptic harlot'.
The words of the Evangelion were blasphemously paraphrased by the Kraków Satanist: 'In the beginning was Lust, and nothing was beside it and everything was in it.'
Cezary Jellenta, a seasoned expert on the Berlin art scene, remained under the influence of Przybyszewski's philosophical and literary output. Jellenta, inspired by Przybyszewski’s suggestive descriptions of Munch's paintings, noticed signs of intensified expression in Podkowiński's last symbolist composition – Chopin’s Funeral March (1894). He interpreted the motifs in the painting according to Przybyszewski's philosophy, emphasising the drama of love ending in death and the tragedy of existence. In 1897, Jellenta codified the distinguishing features of early Expressionism and called it 'intensifism'.
'The spontaneity or concentration of the depicted nature is actually only the spontaneity or concentration of the painter', the critic explained, emphasising the dominating role of the artist’s psychological experience.
Projecting the artist’s feelings and ideas in order to deform and transform them and thus more fully reflect the world of emotions and dreams is a characteristic feature of the proto-expressionist movement developed in the art of Young Poland by Wojciech Weiss, Witold Wojtkiewicz, Ferdynand Ruszczyc, Konrad Krzyżanowski, and Olga Boznańska. Each of them did it differently, through their choice of different motifs and their own means of artistic expression. Proto-expressionism heralded a mature form of expressionism, which, in 1918, was proclaimed by Przybyszewski in an article titled Expressionism – Słowacki and the 'Genesis of the Spirit' published in the Poznań-based magazine Zdrój. It would be realised by the artists of the first wave of the interwar avant-garde, members of the groups Bunt (Rebellion) and Jung Idysz.
Tamed Impressionism
Frenzy of Exultations was preceded by a series of fantastic compositions painted by Podkowiński in the years 1892-1893: Dance of Skeletons, Mirages: a Symbolic Composition, Irony. Fantasy. Give Me Back My Heart, and Nocturne: a Fairy Tale About the Enchanted Princess. In these works, the emotional states of the creator were reflected in a literary anecdote. The surreal aura was created by a blue and green glow which had its roots in impressionist works, which Podkowiński assimilated during his stay in Paris in 1889. In the art of this painter, bravely taking up new creative challenges, a specific dualism, a tension between impressionistic attitude and neo-romantic imagination, was manifested. Podkowiński made two major breakthroughs in Polish art: adaptation of the principles of impressionism and initiation of the proto-expressionist movement. Both these artistic events occurred within four years of each other. The first turning point in the development of Polish painting was marked by an exhibition of paintings Podkowiński and Pankiewicz brought from France in 1890. When these two students of the Gerson Drawing School found themselves in Paris in 1889, they were astonished by the work of Claude Monet, presented during a big retrospective. They made their first attempts at using the impressionistic technique. However, their innovative achievements were not appreciated by the jury of the Warsaw Society for the Encouragement of Fine Arts which wanted to uphold traditional values. Their paintings were finally presented at Aleksander Krywult's salon and were met with harsh criticism. The critics condemned not so much the concept of French luminism as the artistic incompetence and secondary nature of Podkowiński’s and Pankiewicz’s ‘wibryzm’ art. What estranged them was not only the intense colours and colourful shadows but also, most of all, the inability to convey the shimmering, vibrating atmosphere. The unfavourable reception was probably one of the reasons why both Podkowiński and Pankiewicz gradually departed from the orthodox understanding of impressionism. Between 1892 and 1894, Pankiewicz completely abandoned the extravaganza of pure colours in favour of monochromatic nocturnes. The unreal forms of nature submerged in darkness were an artistic equivalent of the emotional states of the artist, who drew inspiration from Mallarmé’s poetry and Whistler’s painting. Thus, the impressionistic episode in Pankiewicz’s art, which came more than two decades after the origin of Monet’s painting method, appeared at the same time as the first manifestations of Polish symbolism and soon gave way to symbolic tendencies. Their full manifestation was Pankiewicz’s painting titled Nocturne: Swans in the Saxon Garden – an almost abstract composition, fulfilling the postulate of synaesthesia, similar to the metaphors of Mallarmé’s sonnet entitled Le Vierge, La Vivace et Le Bel Aujourd’hui.
Podkowiński turned out to be more consistent in developing the knowledge he gained in Paris. Fragments of the Mazovian landscape became a space for him to search for his own version of impressionist painting, a formula rooted both in the tradition of Polish realism and Monet’s luminism. The synthesis of both of these tendencies took place in Podkowiński’s works in 1891 and 1892 during holidays spent in the landed estates of Mokra Wieś and Chrzęsne. It was here that the paintings recognised as masterpieces of Polish art were created: Children in the Garden, Mokra Wieś: Boy in a Pond, and Morning: Orchard in Chrzęsno. They were paintings in which light is transformed into colour and colour is identified with light. The prelude to these works was Łubin in Sunlight – a picture surprising with an aggregative take of a golden strand of lupin. Podkowiński further synthesised forms of landscapes created in 1893 in Wilczyce, Bidziny, Opatów and Sobótka near Sandomierz, piling up horizontally stretched fields and hills. The rhythm of the gentle hills of the Sandomierz landscape were transformed into a harmonious arrangement of planes. The landscape painting titled Wilczyce: the Clover Field is an excellent example of intuitively felt ambivalence characteristic of painting, an expression of tension between the desire to recreate natural phenomena and the imperative of creating a picture emphasising its individuality and its internal structure. In the view from Wilczyce, the artist achieved a state of a perfect balance between these two tendencies. Today we perceive the synthetic strefizm style of the landscapes of Sobótka and Wilczyce as an anticipation of the compositional solutions of outstanding Polish symbolists, even if they are as different from each other as Wojciech Weiss and Jacek Malczewski.
The sense of creative freedom emanates from the open-air studies painted by Podkowiński in 1893-1894. The artist introduced impasto texture and intensified colours, narrowing the field of view and setting the frame of the painting in a randomised manner. The ever stronger synthesis of nature’s forms and the growing expressiveness of the brushstrokes make Podkowiński the progenitor of several outstanding modernists, to mention only Jan Stanisławski, Ferdynand Ruszczyc, and Konrad Krzyżanowski. Podkowiński could not keep up with the transformations in Monet’s matured painting, he could not see the famous series Poplars (1891), Haystacks (1891) or Cathedral in Rouen (1893). He did not live to see Monet’s views of London Parliament (1899-1901) and Venice (1908). Therefore, he could not have been aware of the process of colour empowerment in the art of the great impressionist, which gave a patch of colour self-contained expression, and the slow evolution towards abstraction, which was going to be realised in the artist’s paintings at the end of his life – in Water Lillies and Gardens at Giverny’s. It seems, however, that Podkowiński intuitively sensed the opportunities for development inherent in impressionism, which led to more modern solutions, breaking the direct link with the observed nature and concentrating on purely artistic issues. He also preserved the predilection for colour reductionism, as seen in some of Monet’s landscapes. The radical narrowing of the scale of colours in Podkowiński’s paintings had two consequences. On the one hand, it made the landscape motifs presented unreal to some extent, emphasising the element of artistic transformation, and on the other, it gave an impulse to create artistic fiction, to concretise visions, phantasms, and the artist’s dreams.
We can also observe evolution in the way landscape is perceived in the works of Leon Wyczółkowski. The artist’s long stays in Ukraine, Volhynia, and Podlasie in the years 1883-1895 shaped him into a realist enchanted by the endlessness of the steppe, sensitive to the nostalgic tones of sunrises and sunsets. Direct observation of light effects triggered Wyczółkowski’s extraordinary sensitivity to light-saturated colours. It was reinforced by a lesson from Monet’s retrospective exhibition which the artist saw in Paris in 1889. However, unlike Podkowiński and Pankiewicz, Wyczółkowski did not fully adopt the impressionistic method and did not comply with the requirements of the pointillist technique.
In the scenes from everyday life of Ukrainian peasants painted in the years 1892-1893, he analysed the interaction of pure colours, juxtaposed warm and cold tones, and collided yellows in the illuminated parts with blue in the shadow parts. He condensed expression in the studies of peasant figures, monumentalised, expressing the power of a people reconciled to nature.
Jan Stanisławski, who in 1897 became the head of landscape painting at the School of Fine Arts in Kraków (newly reformed by Fałat), became the creator of the most widely influential form of symbolist landscape. Stanisławski taught a large number of his students how to commune with nature in order to grasp its transcendent dimension, how to find the metaphysical essence of being in the ever-changing sphere of the phenomena of light. By contemplating on a small fragment of nature in close focus – a clump of bodiacs, lupines, or sunflowers – the artist discovered its symbolic meaning. In the floral microcosm, he saw a reflection of the structure of the universe. In his notes on landscape painting, a single plant, even the most modest and the least beautiful, summarises the ‘mental’ expression of the surrounding landscape as long as it is compositionally exposed. By synthesising his visual impressions, Stanisławski had shown his students how to appreciate the value of a colour spot without releasing it from its mimetic function. Apart from technical skills, young artists such as Stanisław Kamocki, Stefan Filipkiewicz, Stanisław Czajkowski, Henryk Szczygliński, Iwan Trusz, and Henryk Uziembło learned from their master how to love the native landscape, admire the Planty Park in Kraków as well as the nearby countryside, the vastness of the Tatra Mountains and the Ukrainian steppes. They identified the painted landscape fragments with Polishness.
Peasant-mania