AK: Throughout your career, you have worked with artists, institutions, and audiences across New Zealand, Europe, and beyond. What role do you believe artists and cultural institutions should play in times of war, uncertainty, and social change?
RG: First, I do not think that war, uncertainty and social change are equivalent conditions. However, what I have come to believe about the role of artists during wartime may also apply more broadly. Since 2022, observing and interacting with Ukrainians confronting a genocidal aggressor has made my view of what artists should do in wartime much clearer. Before then, I might have offered well-meaning ideas or advice, but I would not have spoken as categorically as I do today.
Now, it is clear to me that the one thing an artist should do in times of war is follow their heart. Funny, this sounds like such a cliché in peacetime. But it is not. If art is one of the visible expressions of freedom, then no one can tell an artist what they ought to do, especially now when so many sacrifices are being made to preserve territorial and cultural freedoms. Another reason ‘follow your heart’ is the best advice I can think of, is that it legitimises diversity of expression and multiplicity of art forms. What diversity of individual paths have I witnessed? Artists so affected by the start of the war that they could not create (for an extended period).
Artists who have lost their homes, studios, workshops and artworks in missile or drone attacks have been forced to begin again – an immense act of courage, both technically and emotionally. Others have fled the country or relocated within Ukraine for the sake of their children, partners or parents, often leaving behind the materials and equipment essential to their work, sometimes recovering them later and sometimes not. Some displaced artists have turned to digital media because it offers greater mobility and fewer storage problems. Some people who had never considered themselves artists have begun drawing or painting as a way of processing personal trauma, while others have taken up traditional Ukrainian art forms, such as Petrykivka painting, to strengthen their connection to their cultural identity. Some artists have abandoned their former themes and visual language in favour of wartime or explicitly Ukrainian subjects; others have consciously continued working as before, in a defiant assertion that ‘we are still here, we are still alive – art is life!’
My other piece of advice, wherever possible, is to show as much of your work online as you can, using whichever platform suits you best. The abundance of Ukrainian art online shouts out to the resilience, creativity, and diversity of Ukraine and its peoples. I have also found this visibility helps build community and enables others (such as me) to share stories of creativity.
What about cultural institutions? In the visual arts, there is a longstanding mandate to collect, document, research, restore, protect, repatriate, educate and disseminate isn’t there? In a way, nothing of this changes. But the urgency and circumstances do change. Museums and other cultural institutions have been destroyed. Art collections have been stolen by the aggressor. Artists have been purposely mis-identified as not Ukrainian. These and similar war crimes require careful documentation and research, both to support future war-crimes proceedings and to pursue the repatriation of stolen collections. Perhaps the only change is in the emphasis: in times of genocidal warfare, the institutions carry a particular burden to preserve and re-tell the national stories with considerable urgency.
I see much of this happening through the window of my online research on Ukrainian art and artists, and in my conversations with Ukrainian artists and cultural workers. I also see new and renewed energy in NGOs, volunteer groups, social media groups and community pages, and online databases of artists organised by workshop, city or period – all dedicated to documenting, preserving and sharing Ukraine’s many art histories. My Ukrainian project has certainly benefited from the growing accessibility of these online resources.
Since 2022, the war and the sense of uncertainty that of course reaches far into Poland have also changed the way I work as an artist. I now work exclusively on small-format sheets of paper, ranging from A6 to A2, or in A5 sketchbooks. Partly this is because I have the consciousness of a migrant (since coming to Poland by choice) and a desire to be able to travel lightly. Also, having long held to the mantra ‘expect the best, prepare for the worst’ I want to be able to easily bundle up my many hundreds of drawings and paintings and courier them to my daughter in New Zealand – if I must.
AK: Finally, after all these years of working across cultures, what continues to inspire your curiosity? Is there a project, idea, or dream you still hope to realise?
RG: What continues to inspire my curiosity? The fact that it is still possible to learn. There is a wonderful true story that I can recount from my childhood, where this pattern of always learning was set.
My mother and her elder sister were raised during the Great Depression by a courageous independent woman. My grandmother had her own business as a dress maker and seamstress, but as a divorced woman was unable to rent apartments or premises because of the stigma attached to being a solo mother. Eventually she married again, but a consequence of this was my mother being forced out to work at the age of 12, despite graduating primary school top of her class. The rest of her life she pursued both formal and informal learning opportunities constantly and always shared the discoveries of this life-long passion with her children at the end of each day. I grew up understanding that there was always more to learn about what I was observing, reading or hearing, and that deeper layers could be discovered through reflection, questions and investigation. Now, it feels that my curiosity is completely hard-wired within me. But I know its genesis.
Making art every day and working with primary school children (currently aged 9-14 years) are both learning situations.
My deepest, abiding dream is quite modest: to make art, every day if I can, and to do this as long as I can, because it brings me joy, and because it always confronts me with some degree of the unknown, or new discoveries, and more questions than answers. The uncertainty experienced each time I start a new artwork satisfies my inner self.
The social ‘me’ has a complementary dream: to teach art with as much subtlety, kindness and wisdom as I can, for as long as my mind and body allow. Creating open-ended situations in which students have as much genuine choice as possible also makes every lesson an open-ended learning experience for me. I constantly devise new ways of teaching subjects I have taught for years because I want to see how children respond to the challenges and methods I offer, and how they transform them through the freedom of choice and the power of their own imaginations. To continue working in such an environment is both a privilege and a pleasure. The future is uncertain – as it is for all of us – but I hope I can keep doing this for many years to come.